With the recent debates on smoking all but over, IâÄôd like to hear what the University has to say. IâÄôve yet to hear one legitimate reason the ban should be enacted. So that begs the question, why are you even acknowledging such ludicrous demands? Please, University of Minnesota, explain yourself. Why are you pandering to the demands of a vocal minority? Moreover, why go through all the hassle of holding debates if you fully intend to arrive at the conclusion you presumed from the start: The University must âÄúsaveâÄù us from the âÄúevilsâÄù of smoking since we apparently don’t know better. It is, after all, only our rights that we’re talking about. Adam Preiwisch University student