University of Minnesota community members say they have felt concern surrounding threats received by faculty and student groups on campus.
Third-year Bella Arco said she has seen a spike in violence recently on campus, and had her class move online due to a faculty member receiving threats.
“I would say that people are on edge a little bit, just considering the Charlie Kirk shooting and just increased violence on campuses,” Arco said. “There’s kind of a different vibe on campus where I think people are just more cautious right now.”
Arco said she hopes to see more transparency from the University administration, as they did not send out any alerts regarding the threat made against the faculty member.
“I think there needs to be more openness about stuff like this,” Arco said. “I never received anything directly from the U saying there was a threat made against anyone.”
The Turning Point USA Professors Watchlist is a list of non-conservative professors, including eight University professors. According to NBC, the professors on the watchlist are labeled as members of extreme leftist groups.
“The list, easily available online, now has more than 300 professor names, listed under categories like ‘Terror Supporter,’ ‘LGBTQ,’ ‘Antifa’ and ‘Socialism,’” reported NBC.
Timothy Brennan, a professor in the cultural studies and comparative literature department, said the University has not taken action to the threats on campus and has not commented on the matter.
“The University has done nothing proactively to protect them or to say that, ‘Yes, we understand that there’s a special threat against these constituencies in our community and we’re going to make sure to defend you,’” Brennan said. “Nothing like this, no public statements, no particular actions were taken and so on.”
Brennan urged the University administration to condemn the violence on campus within the University community.
“The administration needs to come forth and say, we are going to defend not only the intellectual inquiry and freedom of our faculty and students,” Brennan said. “But we are going to bodily defend them against the dangers that they face in a culture of violence, and that means everyone.”
Nathaniel Mills, English department chair at the University, said he felt the University administration has not been disclosing information about threats to the community.
“I think there’s just not a lot of communication from the University when it comes to these kinds of threats that are being made, whether directed against a general group of people or individuals,” Mills said. “I think that contributes to a kind of uncertainty and fear around when these threats do happen.”
Mills said he feels the University administration is not prioritizing faculty members’ safety on campus.
“It’s not a really strong interest of the administration taking faculty concerns about their safety seriously,” Mills said.




















@KG
Oct 28, 2025 at 7:54 pm
Who pays your salary? You write like you’re paid by the word.
KG
Oct 26, 2025 at 10:44 am
Dear students, this article makes it sound ominous to be on Kirk’s watch list—but let’s actually see what we’re talking about. You can click the link and check it out yourself. The professors listed there all have detailed bios, which are also pretty well documented.
Take Melanie Yazzie of IAS, for example. A video of one of her presentations shows her declaring that she wants to “dismantle the USA.” Then there’s Nick Estes, also of IAS, who was a Theme Editor for the Journal of Architectural Education and presented himself as an authority on both architecture and Palestine—despite having no formal education or original research in either. Such pretentiousness!
And then we have Rachel Hardeman, who was terminated after draining millions of dollars from her U public health institute, leaving behind a string of unfinished projects. She also used her U-sponsored webpage to promote antisemitic material, which the U later removed. It’s worth asking whether the federal government will pursue embezzlement charges against her.
So, before we get worked up about this “watch list,” take a good look for yourselves. What we should really be asking is: why is the U still paying their salaries?
UMN faculty teach newest developments in their fields
Oct 21, 2025 at 10:37 am
I want my grandchildren to have the best education possible. That means going to a university with faculty who present the newest developments in their respective fields and teach their students to think critically. That’s what faculty at the UMN do. By contrast, this Watchlist sounds a bit like McCarthyism–it makes unsubstantiated public accusations against faculty that the list makers disagree with and/or dislike. Authoritarian governments often try to shut down disagreement in just this way. It also deflects attention from the initial concern in the article: faculty were personally threatened presumably because of who they are and what they teach. That’s not okay.
@Lori
Oct 21, 2025 at 6:58 am
Interesting perspective. Do you think professors are hiding what they teach from the public? Do you really not know you can just look up what anyone here teaches and have a conversation with your children (who are adults if they are students here) about what they might learn? Why do you trust Turning Point to give you information about what your children might be learning vs the university you and your children pay lots of $$ to? It’s amusing you think Turning Point is somehow less ridiculous than the U but thank you for responding so readers can see who you are and why you think what you think! See you next time!
Lori
Oct 20, 2025 at 12:45 pm
Yes, The Professor Watchlist is very appropriate. We need to see what these professor’s are teaching so we can decide if we keep our children at the U of M or send them somewhere else. The things that they are teaching are ridiculous
@M
Oct 17, 2025 at 2:47 pm
In your opinion, is the existence of the Professor Watchlist appropriate?
M
Oct 16, 2025 at 10:27 am
I agree that the Professor Watchlist shouldn’t use terms like “Terror supporter.” That is not appropriate.
It is also not appropriate for a professor at our University to be calling people “pilgrims” and then in another social media post say “kill the pilgrim, save the man,” when referencing an all Lakota show. This is wildly inappropriate, and at many institutions would be a fireable offence. Does knowing that a professor said this make you feel safe at this University if you are white? Imagine if someone who is white said the antithesis of this! Would they still be working here?
There is nothing wrong with bringing awareness to publicly made statements, especially inappropriate ones, however using extreme, subjective, and divisive terminology like “terror supporter” should probably be avoided.
Legal Eagle
Oct 15, 2025 at 5:58 pm
If faculty or staff are threatened as part of their job, the University is legally required as their employer to respond.
correct
Oct 15, 2025 at 2:23 pm
Agree! University administration can only be expected to charge tuition, not to actually care about safety on campus.
Call the cops.
Oct 15, 2025 at 10:58 am
If this had been an actual “threat,” the ones threatened should notify the proper authorities, i.e., the police. The University administration should not be expected to be the first responders.