Serving the UMN community since 1900

The Minnesota Daily

Serving the UMN community since 1900

The Minnesota Daily

Serving the UMN community since 1900

The Minnesota Daily

Daily Email Edition

Get MN Daily NEWS delivered to your inbox Monday through Friday!

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Variety of taxes on menu at Capitol

Tax increases proposed on cigarettes and tobacco, as well as new sales tax on digital media downloads.
A new tax bill would increase the cost of cigarettes by 54 cents per pack and alcohol by as much as 68 cents per liter.
Image by Chris Roberts
A new tax bill would increase the cost of cigarettes by 54 cents per pack and alcohol by as much as 68 cents per liter.

Facing a statewide budget deficit of nearly $4.6 billion over the next two years, state lawmakers want to take a variety of initiatives to raise revenue for the state. The House of Representatives passed a tax bill on Saturday that would increase taxes on tobacco products and alcohol in the state, as well as extend the state sales tax to digital products downloaded on the Internet âÄî the so-called, âÄúiTunes tax.âÄù Taxes on alcohol products would increase between 7 cents and 68 cents per liter depending on the product , should these taxes pass the Legislature and the governor. Total increased alcohol revenue for the state would total more than $209 million during the upcoming two years. Taxes on cigarettes would increase by 54 cents, to $1.77 per pack, in addition to the stateâÄôs sales tax . The state would receive more than $207 million in cigarette taxes under the plan. On the floor of the House on Saturday, the billâÄôs author, Rep. Ann Lenczewski , DFL-Bloomington, defended the initiatives, which are part of a bill that would raise more than $1.7 billion in tax revenue during the upcoming biennium. âÄúIf you are a cigarette smoker, weâÄôre going to bring you up to just the Wisconsin level [of taxation],âÄù she said. âÄúOn the alcohol tax, which has not been raised for 22 years âĦ this is a voluntary part of the economy. There is nobody requiring anybody to buy alcohol.âÄù Republicans attacked the tax increases in the bill. âÄúThis bill isnâÄôt about a more progressive system,âÄù Rep. Laura Brod , R-New Prague, said on Saturday. âÄúThis bill is actually about a more regressive tax code.âÄù A regressive tax places a higher burden on people with a lower income, University of Minnesota public affairs professor Jerry Zhao said. For example, if consumption of cigarettes is the same between someone with a high income and someone with a low income, the tax on the product will hurt the person with the lower income more. Taxes on cigarettes, alcohol and other products get the distinction of being called âÄúsin taxes,âÄù because they tax socially taboo behavior such as smoking or drinking. Sin taxes generally are more acceptable ways to raise revenue without gaining the ire of too many taxpayers, Zhao said. Raising sin taxes has been a trend since the 1970s, he said, when states had different rules regarding raising property taxes. Today, even though they can bring in smaller pots of revenue, Zhao said they can help states reach the ultimate goal of closing budget shortfalls. âÄúMany states use it to close the budget gap,âÄù Zhao said. âÄúIn this kind of situation, every little bit helps.âÄù

âÄúiTunesâÄù Tax

Should the Legislature adopt the HouseâÄôs version of the tax bill, Minnesota would join about 20 other states that apply sales taxes to downloads of digital products such as music, movies, audio books, software and ringtones. Rep. Jim Davnie , DFL-Minneapolis, said the plan would be fairer than the one now âÄî taxing DVDs purchased in stores but not those purchased online is like applying taxes to those sold in Minneapolis but not St. Paul, he said. The final tax would be applied to the purchaser of the music, so those purchasing online products using a credit card based in Minnesota would be affected by the tax, Davnie said. Other states, such as Washington, South Dakota and Wisconsin, apply this tax. The tax is only expected to bring in $3.1 million next biennium, but Davnie said any bit helps. âÄúThese really are drops in the ocean,âÄù he said. âÄúIâÄôm not claiming that IâÄôve solved the budget deficit.âÄù On the floor Saturday, Brod took aim at the proposed tax increases. âÄúThe iTunes tax, starting to tax downloads for music, which will hurt kids and adults, the cigarette tax âĦ the alcohol tax increases,âÄù she said. âÄúI notice that there are tax increases for pretty much everybody.âÄù Proponents of the tobacco, alcohol and digital product taxes face plenty of opposition, however. None of the provisions are in the SenateâÄôs tax bill , and Gov. Tim Pawlenty has threatened to veto tax increases should they come to him. Like with other bills, members of the Senate and House will meet in a conference committee to reach an agreement on the tax proposals before sending it to Pawlenty. -Devin Henry is a senior staff reporter

Leave a Comment
More to Discover

Accessibility Toolbar

Comments (0)

All The Minnesota Daily Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *