Contrary to your insinuation in a Dec. 6 editorial, âÄúAn unreliable source,âÄù the Turkish Coalition of AmericaâÄôs complaint against the University of Minnesota does not question the authority of academic departments to evaluate sources of information according to intelligible, evenhandedly applied educational standards, and, to make those evaluations available to students.
The âÄúunreliable websitesâÄù blacklist concocted by the Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies âÄî unique in the annals of United States pedagogy âÄî betrayed no earmarks of process other than hostility toward a particular viewpoint endorsed by such acclaimed Middle East scholars as Professor Bernard Lewis of Princeton. The list did not remotely satisfy any known form of instruction or evenhanded educational standard. CHGS Director Bruno Chaouat figuratively marked the websites with a âÄúscarlet letter,âÄù forbidding students from questioning CHGSâÄô âÄúinfallibilityâÄù and stunting the development of critical thinking. The standards for listing websites as âÄúunreliableâÄù were unintelligible, listing a site as a âÄústrange mix of fact and opinion.âÄù That statement would seem to fit your editorial like a glove.
Websites were provided no explanation for âÄúscarlet letterâÄù designations.
There was no opportunity to respond or appeal. Listing decisions were made anonymously, secretly and without notice to the allegedly offending website.
The CHGS blacklist was no more educational than the VaticanâÄôs Index of Forbidden Books.
The Minnesota Daily did not do its homework. But even more shameful is its defense of counter-educational indoctrination and censorship as hallmarks of academic freedom.