As a Wisconsinite from the border of Wisconsin and Minnesota, I have always kept myself knowledgeable of political issues surrounding both states, as they were both always relevant to my life. Despite living primarily in Minnesota for the past few years as a student, I have continually voted in Wisconsin, as it is a swing state, and every vote counts in major elections. Now, after living in Minneapolis for a few years, the issues that voters are deciding have become important to me, despite not directly having a voice in the matter.
Being politically active has always been an important part of my life even before I could vote, and especially now that I can vote. Not being able to vote in the Minneapolis election was devastating for me because the issues at hand were huge. However, discussing these issues with people who do have a vote made up for that. Even when we cannot physically vote, we always have the opportunity to inform, educate and make our voices heard.
Citizens of Minneapolis just voted in one of the most prominent elections we have seen in a while. Not only were citizens voting for the mayor, but they were also voting on three crucial ballot measures: the “Mayoral Control” charter amendment, creating a new department of public safety and authorizing the city council to enact rent control.
The issues at hand were instrumental for the state of Minnesota, and will continue to be regardless of the election results. It is necessary to explore and understand the consequences of the election outcome and what this means for the future of Minneapolis. Honestly, before going into detail of the election itself, the results of this election were a devastating loss for achieving necessary change in Minneapolis, especially after the tragic past couple years this city has seen.
The passage of the Executive Mayor-Legislative Council could be extremely harmful to the power of democracy for the simple fact that the amendment limits the power of the legislature and increases the power of the mayor. Weakening the power of elected officials in Minneapolis is extremely harmful to the people who live here. It also limits the potential for these elected officials to fulfil the needs of their constituents and pass their policy agendas.
In my mind, the most devastating loss on this ballot was on question two: the issue of public safety. In Minneapolis, we have witnessed a devastating amount of police brutality throughout the city’s history, and 2020 truly exemplified the need for a new public safety system. For far too long, the Minneapolis Police Department has been unrestrained in their authority. The racist systems and laws that MPD is built upon continues to enable this unjust behavior with zero accountability. The initiative to create a new department of public safety in the city of Minneapolis would have been monumental and had the potential to put an end to the abusive system currently in place.
However, the third question on the ballot, which allows the city council to enact rent control, passed. This was a major step in the right direction to promote affordable housing in Minneapolis, as it allows the city to take measures to stabilize rent and combat the major increase in rent. In recent years, Minneapolis has become extremely unaffordable and has made homelessness one of the most pressing issues within the city.
This election was quite devastating. I believe that if there was any time for major change in Minneapolis, it is now, especially considering the recent events we have all witnessed. However, at the end of the day, Minneapolis citizens spoke and made their decision, and all we can do now is to continue to advocate for meaningful and necessary changes within this city.
Meat Eater
Nov 15, 2021 at 3:11 pm
for every victim of the police there are at least 100, perhaps a 1000 citizens brutalized by the social deviates who have taken advantage of the current political climate to brutalize their fellow citizens, that’s why Q2 failed, and several council members were ousted, there were more people with common sense than people lacking in it, which came as surprise to us all, thanks to the media that focuses it attention on the those who scream and stamp their feet the loudest
UMN0001
Nov 13, 2021 at 11:07 pm
The rent control passage in both St. Paul and Minnesota WILL have serious consequences that many voting did not consider. Yes, its passage could help with “affordable” housing. However, there will be a shift towards less new construction of multi-family complexes. Many of the prominent developers in the Twin Cities have already spoken out against the passage of these measures. Builders will turn away from these cities and focus development in surrounding cities. If lenders cannot capitalize on long term gains from market rate price increases, developers will not get financing for projects. The twin cities has seen a very significant increase in population over the last decade. That trend specifically for Minneapolis and St. Paul may level out then if there are simply not the places for people to live. Surrounding cities like Edina, St. Louis Park, Robbinsdale, Bloomington, Roseville, etc. should see a spike in development.
A Gopher
Nov 11, 2021 at 7:02 pm
Mayoral power was necessary and brings us more in line with every other major city. The city council should be legislative whilst the mayor’s office is the executive-actionable branch of government. Take the George Floyd riots, for example, the police chief and the mayor need to make quick decisions regarding force and escalation tactics. Having to consult with 14 other people makes any decisive decision impossible. The city council hasn’t been abolished, it’s still there, but in a role more suited to legislation and interior neighborhood work. The defund amendment lost by 12 points! That’s massive in a liberal city like this and speaks volume with how out of touch both you and the city council is with the rank and file “real people” of Minneapolis. The third amendment only gives the city council the right to explore rent control. The St. Paul amendment was much more invasive and lead to the immediate shuttering of all building projects. Yup, the law of unintended consequences. Take away a businesses right to control their own property and you lose said business. Now, there will be less new housing, fewer rooms for rent, and those rooms will receive less maintenance to persevere the profit margin. You kids still haven’t learned the law of cause and effect. There needs to be much more elegant and thoughtful changes to achieve the utopia you so desire.