The University of Minnesota Law School paused its search for a new assistant dean of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) as the University reassessed its DEI programs Jan. 31.
The pause came just two weeks after President Donald Trump’s executive order to ban DEI initiatives in any programs receiving federal funding. The order also called for all federal DEI staff to be put on paid leave with the expectation of their eventual layoffs.
The executive order followed by the hiring pause prompted reactions from students and faculty on what might happen on campus.
Emmanuel Mauleón, an associate professor at the Law School, said most people were shocked by the announcement to pause the hiring process since they were still engaged in the hiring process and had planned to interview candidates that week. Mauleón said he thinks University President Rebecca Cunningham understands removing the assistant dean position does not mean the assistant dean’s work disappears.
“When the position evaporates, it’s not like the support that those students need evaporates,” Mauleón said. “It just begins to get spread out amongst the professors with which students feel comfortable approaching these issues.”
Mauleón said the pause creates more vulnerability for the people DEI programming was intended to support in the first place.
Mauleón and three dozen faculty members sent letters to Cunningham last Thursday asking for the position to be reinstated.
“That was just something that the faculty organized in support of the position and in support of our students, frankly, because our students have been demanding action from the faculty,” Mauleón said. “There hasn’t been communication between the president’s office and the faculty.”
Mauleón said his meetings with students have increased in the past week, and that it has been difficult since the announcement. He said students feel like they have been sold a false promise with several students coming to the law school specifically because of its commitment to DEI.
Samia Abdulle, Undergraduate Student Government (USG) Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee Director, said she is optimistic Trump’s executive order will not cause as much harm as Trump anticipates.
Abdulle said the order has not affected the Committee’s work and added the University has taken certain steps to make sure DEI is protected within the University and believes DEI is not going anywhere in Minnesota.
The Law School hiring freeze disappointed Abdulle, but she said it did not surprise her. She believes cutting federal funding in any capacity will hurt students more than help them.
Abdulle said she wished the University was more communicative with students likely to be impacted by the rollbacks, but understands the University is facing a loss of federal funding and federal pushback.
“I honestly think that was just like they were just a little bit scared, and they were just doing what they could to just keep their federal funding,” Abdulle said. “They were doing what they thought was the safest option and the most conservative option, but that does not mean that I’m not disappointed.”
Council of Graduate Students (COGS) President Cal Mergendahl said COGS needs enhanced communication from the University.
Mergendahl said COGS values its relationship with administration, but there is a lot of fear and concern with the absence of clear and effective communication from the University.
“That fear is going to proliferate, it’s going to turn into panic, it’s going to turn into paranoia and that’s just not a healthy thing for the campus,” Mergendahl said. “I think it’s something that as a student leader, I personally think we should address. And I think COGS in general, has generally been of the opinion in the past that if and when things happen, the University should do its best to keep the students, keep our constituents informed as much as we can.”
Dylan Young, a graduate student at the Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs and Board of Regent Candidate, said there is a climate of uncertainty among the student body at this time.
Young, a Native American student who graduated from the University of Minnesota-Morris, said DEI programming has been pivotal to his education and personal journey in life.
“I think that my experience as a student has been greatly enriched by being able to meet people from diverse perspectives, and be exposed to ideas that I otherwise wouldn’t have been exposed to from back home,” Young said. “I think without DEI, there would be a lot of students that simply don’t have that.”
Young said as he sees other institutions back away from DEI and roll back their initiatives, it presents the University with an opportunity to stay true to DEI.
“It shows that we have a backbone,” Young said. “It shows that we stand for what we stand for, and whatever is happening at the White House doesn’t change that. It shows that our college campuses are ones that will prepare students for the real world better than our other competitors.”
Correction: A previous version of this article stated that Emmanuel Mauleón thinks the Law School Dean William McGeveran understands removing the assistant dean position does not mean the assistant dean’s work disappears. Mauleón was referring to Cunningham, not McGeveran.
A previous version of this article listed Samia Abdulle’s last name incorrectly. Other edits have been made for clarity.
Check your history
Feb 18, 2025 at 5:08 pm
Are you unaware of the Civil Rights legislation of the 1960’s? The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a landmark law that outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on July 2, 1964. Hiring a less qualified white over a more qualified minority is discriminatory. If this happened to any black, they would raise holy hell and sue.
Just merit
Feb 18, 2025 at 2:42 pm
Agree. Let hiring and promotion be based on one’s merit, not race, color, sex, national origin, religion, or sexual identification or preference. That is not what DEI was designed to do.
so simple
Feb 18, 2025 at 12:50 pm
DEI initiatives were not put in place to ensure lower-qualified minorities could get hired instead of more highly-qualified white people. It was put in to place to ensure lower-qualified white people were not hired instead of more highly-qualified minorities.
c'mon
Feb 18, 2025 at 12:25 pm
um, no, it’s not segregation and you know it. It’s inclusivity and representation – these concepts are not hard to understand.
c’mon
Feb 18, 2025 at 11:53 am
um, no, that’s not segregation, it’s inclusivity and representation, which is good for everyone. These concepts are not at all hard to understand. If you’re only comfortable dealing with people who look like you, just say so but do not stand in the way of the rest of us who thrive in diversity.
c'mon
Feb 18, 2025 at 11:16 am
uh, no, it’s not segregation, it’s inclusivity and representation.
These concepts are not hard to understand. It’s literally a matter of choosing to include everyone because that is what feels and works best for everyone. If you’d prefer to only deal with people who look like you, just say so but do not stand in the way of what the majority chooses.
Hmmm.
Feb 18, 2025 at 10:51 am
Please consider proponents of more teachers and health care providers that “look like” those they serve and care for. Is this not segregation?
peaceispossible
Feb 17, 2025 at 9:10 pm
Respectfully, you may want to consider that being anti-DEI is being pro-segregation.
The classroom
Feb 14, 2025 at 5:31 pm
Dear UMN teacher, with respect, the classroom is not the real world. It is ideally a place of learning, evaluating, discussing, and preparing to contribute in the real world. DEI may “work” in the classroom but most companies and organizations have already distanced themselves from it. This should be considered as you instruct others.
I see
Feb 13, 2025 at 3:39 am
I’m just sharing my experience in the classroom, DEI is positive and powerful. I notice just mentioning it outside the classroom causes the MAGAs to practically run out of the woodwork to show who they are. Very handy.
Dear UMN teacher
Feb 12, 2025 at 5:00 pm
Dear UMN teacher, DEI is not really necessary The Civil Rights movement and legislation of the 1960’s guarantee equal opportunity for all Americans regardless of race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Equal opportunity does not mean equal outcomes. What has the minority community against a merit-based system? Let the best qualified person be placed in the appropriate position.
a teacher here
Feb 12, 2025 at 10:00 am
DEI is just a new term for speaking honestly about the history and living experience of this place as a predominantly white institution. There nothing discriminatory about DEI and those who try to say so are just hiding from reality. DEI work has been happening for many years but for me, as an instructor here, it’s only very recently that I’ve felt confident and comfortable speaking openly about DEI issues in the classes I teach. My students respond excellently to the deeper honesty and authentic exchange of information. It’s obvious they appreciate DEI being imbedded in our curricula.
DEI = a form of discrimination
Feb 11, 2025 at 1:57 pm
The elected Administration considers DEI a form of discrimination. Discrimination is discrimination, no matter who is affected. Are non-minorities even considered for executive positions in DEI? If not, why not?