The University of Minnesota and high school students are working together with the state legislature to target legal loopholes to improve gun safety in Minnesota schools.
Jenny Wen, a student at Columbia University, is part of a student-led policy group working with state Rep. Julie Greene (DFL), to draft a new gun safety bill for the upcoming legislative session.
“This isn’t about taking away anyone’s guns,” Wen said. “It’s about addressing the reality of gun theft, accidental access and impulsive violence.”
The bill would establish uniform requirements for securely storing firearms in vehicles parked on all school property.
It also extends those requirements to Minnesota State High School League-sanctioned events and removes a provision allowing principals to give individuals permission to carry firearms inside school facilities.
Fourth-year Matthew Smeaton said he remembers sitting on a school bus years ago when a tree branch scraped across the windows. A friend jumped, thinking it was gunfire.
“That always stuck out to me just because of how ridiculous it is that we have to live in a world where that’s a concern kids have,” Smeaton said.
Now, Smeaton and other students are working with Greene on a proposed gun safety bill.
Though the bill is still being revised by nonpartisan legislative staff, the group says the goal is a common-sense policy that most people can agree on.
“We joked about calling it the ‘Come On, Guys’ bill,” Smeaton said. “It’s mostly something everyone can agree on.”
Smeaton said it aims to address gun violence in a way that avoids extremes.
“A lot of important change happens at the local level,” Smeaton said. “I wasn’t familiar with how things get done before this, and I’m very thankful to learn how the sausage gets made.”
Logan Bracken, a senior at Edina High School, joined Greene’s office after meeting her through a school program.
“I’m really passionate about public policy,” Bracken said. “It sounds cliché, but I do want to make an impact in my community.”
Bracken referenced a case where a student took a gun from an unlocked vehicle in a school parking lot and used it to take his own life.
“It’s insane to even say that out loud,” Bracken said. “It shows how avoidable some of these tragedies are. We’re not asking people to give up their guns, just to secure them.”
Wen said the group was motivated by data showing that firearms left unsecured in vehicles have become a major source of stolen guns nationwide. According to Everytown Research:
- More than 350,000 firearms are stolen annually in the U.S.
- At least one unsecured gun is stolen from a car every nine minutes.
- Gun thefts from vehicles tripled between 2013 and 2023.
Wen said Minnesota law currently bans firearms at school-sanctioned events such as football games, but includes a “major loophole” in that individuals may carry a firearm if they obtain permission from a principal.
“Generally, there’s no legitimate reason someone needs to bring a gun to a school football game,” Wen said. “Just because something is technically legal doesn’t mean it’s safe.”
The group has received some public criticism. Wen said the chair of the Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus called her position “emotional” and lacking grounding in current law.
“We want to make it exceedingly clear we’re not targeting peaceful, responsible gun owners,” Wen said. “If your gun gets stolen from your car and used in a violent act, you can be held responsible, and no responsible gun owner wants that.”















John H. Anderson
Dec 15, 2025 at 5:50 pm
The University of Minnesota, State Representatives and government et. al should not be illegally conspiring to criminal civil rights clearly enumerated by the United States Consititution.
For example, it isn’t for anyone to make a moral judgement on the need to carry a firearm for personal safety period. You don’t need to tell Minnesotans what they need to do or not do with their civil rights.
Put curtly we know that Democrats make immature and emotionally charged arguments to justify paying for a literal gun control advocacy clinic on campus designed to directly use public funding to criminalize gun ownership. This is a slippery slope of deciding for others who needs to excercise their rights and how is an example of what we don’t need. Minnesota already has a law that requires firearms to be unloaded and cased when being transported unless they are being carried lawfully with a permit to conceal and carry a pistol. The implentation of laws like this framed as: lock it up in your vehicle have resulted in criminal charges in state like New Jersy and the requirement of costly retrofitting of cars with custom safes that are non-standard equipment on nearly all personal vehicles.
The red herring argument regarding suicide is pretty ironic given that University of Minnesota student groups have supported the right to die and legalizing assisted suicide. Making a value judgement in how a person decides to end their life is clearly not appropriate if you truly support RTD.