As the University of Minnesota’s Board of Regents wrapped up their two-day-long meeting sessions Thursday and Friday, a plethora of discussions circulated regarding the Board’s proposed budget for the next fiscal year, including the potential for a sixth straight year of tuition hikes for University students.
The proposed budget includes a 3.8% tuition increase for resident undergraduate students across all campuses – with non-resident undergraduate students on the Twin Cities campus facing up to 4.5%, according to a Finance & Operations docket.
If passed, this will be the sixth consecutive year that students will face tuition increases at the University, according to the University’s Institutional Data and Research. The increase is projected to create a revenue stream of $34.4 million across the University system.
During Thursday’s discussion, University President Rebecca Cunningham said the University may have to make cuts alongside the tuition increase. She said she is aware of the potential stress University community members are voicing.
“I’m deeply aware and sympathetic of this belt-tightening, which is what the state is asking us to do essentially when we don’t have an increase [of funding],” Cunningham said. “It is stressful to our faculty and staff who are striving to provide great education — but we have to prioritize.”
Cunningham said, alongside other administrative officials, the recurring decision to increase tuition has been a difficult but necessary step to take.
“We simply have to make the math work,” Cunningham said. “It will take all of us working together.”
During the meeting, various administrators cited state funding concerns and rising inflation rates as the primary reasons behind the tuition hike. However, this claim is facing scrutiny from community advocates.
The regents accepted in-person public commentary during a public forum portion of a meeting on June 12, in which several University community members spoke, notably including retired professors, faculty, staff and students.
University English professor Eric Daigre shared his frustrations during the forum. Daigre said he is concerned the proposed budget will hurt the University’s mission, as money could be moved away from essential University programs.
“There’s more than one way to balance a budget,” Daigre said. “My concern is that we’re balancing the budget by defunding the actual educational mission of the University: education and research.”
Daigre criticized the disproportionate salaries paid to various administrative officials, suggesting that these funds be put towards faculty and students who are actively struggling with academic financing.
In addition to the increase in tuition, many are concerned about the projected budget cuts and how they will impact students, faculty and staff. Community members questioned both the tuition increase and budget cuts, urging regents to think about the detrimental effects departments will see as a result of these cuts.
Fae Hodges, a student in the College of Education and Human Development, said that while the proposed budget information states why the cuts are being made, it fails to put into perspective how much of a detriment will be seen as a result.
“I, and many other students, are paying increasingly more each year for the quality of our education to be worsening,” Hodges said. “Not due to our professors or TAs, who work increasingly hard for less money, but because the funds are dwindling at the department level.”
Hodges spoke to the effects they have seen during their time on campus, such as larger class sizes with slower grading feedback due to the decreased number of teaching assistants and a departmental funding deficit.
The Board is expected to vote on the finalization of the budget on June 26, and virtual commentary is being accepted via the Board’s Virtual Forum until 10:00 a.m. on June 25.






















fact check
Jun 25, 2026 at 10:50 am
From an April 13, 2018 Daily article, we learn that Rosha sent sexually explicit texts to the complainant and, even though he was specifically asked to stop attending this student’s music recitals, he continued to do so. Just to educate those in the comments defending Rosha, it’s very common for people to not want to speak on the record around stalking / sex pest behavior. I imagine the young woman in this case was terrified she’d be doxxed. I suspect McNally employees were concerned for their jobs if they were to speak out. If you’re concerned with high tuition, there are better champions to align yourself with than this guy.
But he did that
Jun 25, 2026 at 6:59 am
He still did that dirty stuff though. The people interviewed in the investigation were too fearful of retaliation to go on the record. But keep defending the guy, men like him are a dime a dozen and they almost always get away with their cheap, low down behavior while other weirdos surface to deflect and defend with comments like “case closed”.
Case closed
Jun 24, 2026 at 9:03 am
According to the record, “Lewis [investigating attorney from Minneapolis] said he interviewed 11 unnamed witnesses, including former employees of McNally Smith, and that none of them was able to corroborate the original accusations [against Rosha] or identify the woman who was allegedly harassed.” Case closed.
Priorities?
Jun 23, 2026 at 6:28 pm
So you’re just fine with him being a student stalker? You’re the one who should check their records.
Rosha held the line
Jun 18, 2026 at 6:08 pm
Regent Rosha was often the only BOR vote to freeze tuition. Check your records.
Really?
Jun 17, 2026 at 10:13 am
This is why I believe in the trades. Affordable, and after the training, you can start working in the trade you learned. Universities —always the looming tuition hike issue. A possible U of M tuition hike AGAIN, six years in a row, students accumulating more and more debt—up to their eyeballs. Totally out of touch “solution” that does not solve anything. I agree with the others here—cut the higher-up’s salary and/or no salary increase for them.
still nope
Jun 16, 2026 at 2:33 pm
Rosha voted along with the rest of the Board to raise tuition even as he complained about tuition hikes on the record on behalf of students. He used that and other strategies to ingratiate himself with the undergrad community because he is a creep and a particularly ugly parasite, to use your terms of reference.
Anonymous
Jun 16, 2026 at 10:29 am
I’ve heard executive elites tell the parasitic Board of Regents that they would raise tuition every year no matter how much money the state gives them, to absolutely no pushback. The BOR hasn’t had any voice in its body willing to meaningfully push back and rock the boat since Darrin Rosha, say what you want about him otherwise. These executive elites make too damn much and gouge the students. Rebecca Cunning-Ham is at least bad at pretending she isn’t pure evil.
clevernamehere
Jun 15, 2026 at 6:59 pm
What, do you think, stops Pres Cunningham from taking faculty up on their offer for collaboration and trust-building? Ex Provost Carson really poisoned the well in terms of the faculty-admin relationship yet Cunningham seems dug into that dynamic when she could easily pivot to something better. It’s well past time asking our undergrads, grad students and non tenured instructors to accomplish more and more with less and less while upper admin is paid in gold coins AND disparages and disrespects anyone who is not in their tax bracket. How long will our undergrads (and their parents) put up with this??
Nooooo Rosha, ever again
Jun 15, 2026 at 6:55 pm
Darrin Rosha, the stalker of a female student when he was at the McNally School of Music? Darrin Rosha, who aligned himself with the Fight for $15 on campus because most of the activists were young women? Darrin Rosha, who inspired using the Student Code of Conduct to chill free speech on campus? Darrin Rosha, the super sketchy attorney for a faux dermatologist? No, the current BoR does not need to be further compromised by pests like Darrin Rosha, snap out of it.
Rebecca, girl, come on
Jun 15, 2026 at 2:46 pm
Six. Years. In. A. Row. Our tuition has increased and we’re supposed to sit here and take this seriously? Students are struggling – especially with federal cuts to FAFSA. Professors, instructors and TAs aren’t doing much better and for some reason the people who make boat loads of money seem to think that’s perfectly okay. I’d prefer to see Cunningham’s salary cut ($950,000 and growing, according to MPR) but I doubt she’d agree. Blaming this on inflation makes me laugh.
Where is Rosha?
Jun 15, 2026 at 2:27 pm
No matter what anyone says or how much they object, the proposed 2027 budget and tuition increase will be approved by a large majority of Regents on June 26. For balance, the Board could use another person like former Regent Darrin Rosha.
Maybe Reduce Upper Admin Instead
Jun 15, 2026 at 2:01 pm
Tuition hikes, reduction of faculty and teaching positions are apparently necessary to keep the university afloat, but we absolutely *need* to have more and more high-paid upper administration positions that do nothing for the day-to-day function of the university or its mission as a teaching and research institution.
At this point, it feels like Cunningham and the upper administration of the university exist solely to siphon off tax and tuition money.
Where is my money going?
Jun 15, 2026 at 12:39 pm
Every year, tuition increases- where does it end? The student body not a cash cow for Cunningham’s lifestyle. They claim to understand what we have been through, the stress that this tuition hike will cause. Do they really?
Chop at the Top
Jun 15, 2026 at 10:55 am
Cunningham says we will work together and then raises tuition for students. What about eliminating some top admin positions and asking her to take a pay cut? She forked out 15 million for a failed branding campaign. Perhaps, we could get that money back…