In early December, “lockdown, locks, lights, out of sight” echoed from the loudspeakers in Edina High School. Teachers locked classroom doors as students hid, prayed and texted their families that they loved them.
It was a false alarm.
For Aditi Jha, an 11th grader at EHS, the fear she witnessed was another example of why she is passionate about gun safety.
Jha is one of six students who spent the past year writing a bill requiring firearms left in vehicles on school property to be unloaded and locked in a container out of plain sight. The rule would extend to events sanctioned by the Minnesota State High School League.
The proposal would also remove principals’ authority to allow someone to carry a firearm on campus, except for student resource officers. Principals and superintendents across the state submitted testimony in support of the bill.
The students said the changes would help prevent firearm theft and reduce the risk of guns being in the wrong hands near schools. Hennepin County Sheriff Dawanna Witt testified in favor of the measure and said her office recovered hundreds of stolen firearms in 2025.
The bill stalled in the House after a party-line tie vote in the Education Policy Committee on Feb. 25, with all Republicans voting against it. The group will present the bill to the Senate within the next few weeks.
The outcome of the House committee hearing was frustrating, Jha said, as some lawmakers who opposed the bill were on their phone for parts of the testimony or did not participate in the discussion — but still voted no.
“That hurt me a lot,” Jha said.
University of Minnesota fourth-year Matthew Smeaton, who helped write and present the bill, said he suspects it was ultimately killed over politics, though some Republicans teetered on voting yes.
“People will offer lip service,” Smeaton said. “They’ll say, ‘I’m going to vote no because I have genuine concerns about it, but I really feel for you.’ But the real test is to watch how they vote.”
The desks of 10-year-old Harper Moyski and 8-year-old Fletcher Merkel sat outside the House committee room during the hearing. The two students were killed, and dozens were wounded when a shooter fired into a church at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis. On the Capitol’s front lawn, 60 desks were set up by Annunciation parents representing the children lost to gun violence since 2021.
As lawmakers walk past those desks every day and hear testimonies, Jha hopes they move beyond traditional party gun views.
“Violent and terrible things are happening to our state’s kids,” Jha said. “It just seems to me that we’ve just gotten to a point where lawmakers are so detached.”
Firearms are the leading cause of death for children in the U.S., according to the Sandy Hook Promise. Since the Columbine High School shooting in 1999, more than 428 schools have experienced shootings, impacting nearly 400,000 students.
Jha is hopeful the bill will progress in the Senate, calling it a common-sense bill. Every constitutional right comes with responsibilities, she said.
“We have the right to free speech, does that mean you can yell fire in a movie theater? No it doesn’t,” Jha said.
Claire Albrecht, a law student at the university and student attorney with its Gun Violence Prevention Clinic, said the bill does not intrude on Second Amendment rights.
Albrecht, along with a university law professor, Megan Walsh, testified on behalf of the bill. Walsh, director of the clinic, said the Second Amendment allows for heightened safety regulations in schools, and the majority of Minnesotans support regulations like those in the bill.
Albrecht said it is inspiring to see young people continuing to steward gun violence prevention.
“Young people will keep coming up with new solutions and new opinions,” Albrecht said. “This isn’t the end of gun violence prevention. It’s the middle of the story.”
Smeaton said he grew up in the fight for gun safety and remembers participating in school walkouts and talking to lawmakers. Today’s youth are tomorrow’s voters and policymakers, he added.
“If we as youth continue to suffer by the hands of inaction, someday soon we will just make the changes ourselves,” Smeaton said.
Though it is easy to get pessimistic, Jha believes it is important to remain civically involved.
“Keep trying, keep contacting your legislators and just do what you can. Because, you know, it only takes a small group of people to change the world.”





















@Marie
Mar 30, 2026 at 10:40 am
The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms, stating this right “shall not be infringed”. It was designed to ensure a “well regulated Militia” for state security.
Individual Right (2008): In District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected to service in a militia, specifically for lawful purposes like self-defense within the home.
Self-Defense Outside the Home (2022): In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. Bruen, the Court ruled that the amendment covers the right to carry handguns publicly for self-defense.
END OF DISCUSSION!!!
Marie
Mar 17, 2026 at 10:36 am
“Guns don’t kill people, people kill people” is a weak and cowardly dodge. Of course a person decides to harm. But pretending the weapon doesn’t matter ignores how violence actually works. A gun turns impulse into irreversible tragedy in seconds. It requires little strength, no proximity, and almost no time for doubt or intervention. That’s not a minor detail – that’s the whole point.
When anger flares or judgment slips, the presence of a gun makes death far more likely than survival. That’s not ideology. It’s borne out again and again in the data: more access to firearms means more gun deaths, from homicides to suicides. Intent may come from a person, but lethality is dictated by the tool.
That slogan also conveniently shrugs off any responsibility. If it’s only about “bad people,” then there’s nothing to fix. No policies to consider, no safeguards to implement, no accountability to demand. It’s a way to end the conversation without even attempting to solve the problem of innocent children being gunned down in their classrooms.
A more accurate view would be that “people cause violence, but guns make that violence far more deadly.”
So let’s drop the empty rhetoric. Every time it’s repeated, it dismisses the very real, very preventable loss experienced by families and communities. If we actually value life, we should be willing to confront the factors that make losing it so easy and not hide behind a line that explains nothing and changes less.
Jay
Mar 10, 2026 at 10:36 am
News Flash:
Guns don’t kill people, people kill people!! It takes a person to kill another person a gun can’t do it on its own so stop the BS on gun control!!
It is our right to keep and bear arms and it shall not be infringed!!
Do your part to support these great groups:
Gun Owners of America (GOA)
Second Amendment Foundation (SAF)
Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC)
National Rifle Association (NRA)
American Suppressor Association (ASA)
Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus (MGOC)