The Executive Office for Immigration Review fired Fort Snelling immigration judge Amy Zaske last month, immigration court sources confirmed to the Minnesota Daily.
In April, the court held the deportation trial of University of Minnesota international graduate student Doğukan Gunaydin, who was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement for over a month.
Zaske’s firing comes during a time of nationwide dismissals of immigration judges by EOIR, which cites the executive branch’s authority under Article 2 of the Constitution. A spokesperson for EOIR declined to comment, saying the office does not comment on personnel matters.
Fort Snelling Immigration Court oversees immigration cases for Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota residents. The court had over 21,000 new cases filed in 2024 and is currently experiencing a backlog of 38,694 cases, with the number likely to increase before the end of the year.
Former Assistant Chief Immigration Judge at Fort Snelling Ryan Wood said losing another immigration judge will push the limits of an already strained system.
“The court system on January 19th, 2025, was operating at 125%, or more,” Wood said. “The staff, we were running a sprint pace at marathon lengths indefinitely.”
Wood also said the shortage of administrative staff is equally problematic for the case backlog.
“When you think of the amount of staff work it takes to manage a case docket of 40,000 cases, it’s a lot of people,” Wood said. “They are woefully understaffed, and I don’t know how they’re going to keep up with this.”
Along with staffing changes, the way immigration law has been enforced has changed substantially since President Donald Trump took office in January. The number of individuals criminally prosecuted for immigration violations reached around 6,885 in May, according to Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, up from about 3,344 in February, Trump’s first full month in office.
At Fort Snelling, mounting pressure from the federal government to increase immigration enforcement has led to changes in judges’ decision-making. According to Amy Lange, project manager for The Advocates for Human Rights’ court observation project, the Department of Homeland Security has increased the number of motions to dismiss immigration cases, subjecting immigrants to potential detention and deportation by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Lange says judges have repeatedly shifted stances on how to deal with motions for dismissal.
“There were two judges when this first started that weren’t automatically dismissing cases, then obviously there was a lot of pressure that came from above because then they were dismissing every case,” Lange said. “In the last week, we’ve seen two different judges deny a dismissal, and that’s new since early August.”
According to Lange, the administrative staff at the court has rapidly departed. She said that in some cases, staff were provided financial incentives to depart, and in other instances, staff members were fired.
Lange also echoed Wood’s concerns about court system funding and confirmed that former Immigration Judge Zaske’s cases had been reassigned.
“They’re reassigning her cases to other people,” Lange said. “People were showing up for afternoon appearances with Judge Carr, and those hearings had been rescheduled for June, but nobody knew.”
Wood said that Homeland Security Investigations’ and enforcement priorities have shifted under the Trump administration to emphasize immigration.
“They [prosecutors] have metrics; we want to see x number of worksite enforcement actions, x number of prosecutions for child exploitation,” Wood said. “Those metrics have turned to immigration enforcement.”
Fort Snelling currently has six immigration judges. To Wood, the onslaught of firings and pressure on immigration judges has a more discrete motivation of making a mental impact.
“We can’t see a lot of logic in the noise right now, other than that it’s putting fear in the judges,” Wood said. “You’re making close decisions on the bench, and that weighs. On the human level, it’s really tough.”





















Nunya Bizness
Jan 23, 2026 at 8:34 pm
Judging based off the statistics and graphs I just seen in the last 5 minutes, it seems like there is a state issue as well. According to the numbers I seen and the numbers that I crunched together the average wait time in 2025 is 9000 days for somebody waiting for their asylum application to go through. That is almost 25 years. When Trump came and was in office in 2017 the numbers were at $7,000. That was nearly 20 years alone. So since we are only in 2026, that means that the federal government is been working on applications from way back between 2000 and 2005. So the fact that these people’s applications are still pending and have not gone through is actually not error from them, it’s error on the part of the government. Maybe they should take some accountability too. And on record Florida is the state with the highest numbers of backlog and numbers. So maybe someone should potentially investigate Ron De Santis? Find out WHY? Bottom line is, it wasn’t the faults of the people, per se. They are being hunted because of the errors of the government being short staffed and 20+ yrs backlogged..TF?!? If the judges in this article in fact did exactly as she stated….that is potentially enough to report to the Minnesota Bar as it sounds like an ethics violation possibly? I know it’s not legal….that’s for damn sure and I’m sure they ALL can lose their licenses to practice for life. All these judges doing this behavior deserve to be disbarred and immediately for violating innocent (not saying all are) asylum seeking immigrants or US citizens. This is definitely a lawless government we have currently and it’s REALLY sad they will all be remembered in history for this. Hope all their grandkids see it 🙂
Rick
Oct 22, 2025 at 12:56 pm
If Sleepy Joe would have not let them all in this would be a mute point.
LunaBoona
Oct 22, 2025 at 11:03 am
Thank you to the author for highlighting this issue. It is heartbreaking to see so many people given unfair civil trials, ripped away from their communities, and face indefinite detention to fit the twisted political agenda of a minority of Americans. These are our family members, friends, fellow students, and neighbors.
If legal immigration were the goal, this administration would not make an already impossible process even more difficult by targeting the courts and firing judges. “illegal” has always been a dog whistle to deport anyone who doesn’t look, speak, and act like the white christian nationalists.