The University of Minnesota Senate voted in favor of establishing a Mutual Academic Defense Compact for the Big Ten Academic Alliance at the April 25 meeting.
The mutual defense compact, also known as the Rutgers Resolution, protects universities by creating a defense fund. The fund is meant to be used by any institution under “direct political or legal infringement,” according to the resolution.
Details of the fund, including the amount each participant will contribute, have not been publicized.
The resolution was passed at Rutgers less than a month ago, and Indiana University, the University of Michigan, Michigan State and the University of Nebraska have since endorsed the coalition.
The University of Southern California, the University of Wisconsin, Ohio State and the University of Minnesota were considering joining the resolution, according to V.V. Ganeshananthan, who introduced the resolution.
Fifty-eight senators from the University of Minnesota’s Twin Cities, Rochester and Duluth campuses publicly co-sponsored the resolution. The University Senate also endorsed a statement, passed by several other universities in the country, in support of the core mission values of higher education.
Jennifer Goodnough, the Faculty Consultative Committee chair, introduced the statement and said the committee received positive feedback.
No one argued against the mutual defense compact during the Senate meeting.
“We are at an unprecedented moment in world history, and we miss that reality at our own peril,” Eric Schwartz, a professor at the Humphrey School, who previously spoke publicly about the need to support academic freedom, said. “The institutions of democratic and civil society are under the fiercest attack, and the universities are clearly in the sight of President Trump and his henchmen.”
University Senator Scott Creer said the goal of confrontations, like those at Columbia and Harvard University, is to attack universities’ independence and undermine democracy.
The University is currently the subject of two federal investigations, one into antisemitism. Greer said the collective action within the Big 10 academic alliance would protect the University from federal concerns.
Ofelia Ferran, a professor in the Spanish and Portuguese department, said the University is clearly under threat from federal pressures.
“About a month ago, President Cunningham wrote saying sticks in a bundle are unbreakable, talking about the need to be united in the face of attacks,” Ferran said. “That is what this compact is doing.”
Students also supported the resolution, including Alexander Campbell, an undergraduate student in the College of Science and Engineering, who said it is far better to be united than alone.
“The point of resolution is defense against the wannabe authoritarian Trump Administration,” Campbell said. “Such defense will deter plans against this school and others and ensure that we have a better chance at standing up for ourselves, with the help of other Big 10 schools.”
KG
Apr 30, 2025 at 11:31 pm
The U receives roughly 20% of its budget from the federal government and is already under investigation. Rebecca Cunningham is wisely trying to avoid drawing unnecessary attention—no need to wave a red flag at a raging bull. But faculty pushing for blatantly reckless measures are nothing short of fools. Tell us, geniuses: where are you planning to find $4 billion while some potential lawsuit drags on through the courts? Why don’t you be honest with students and admit that your policies would force tuition hikes and cut essential services to fund your stupidity?
These faculty aren’t champions of free speech or academic freedom—they are dishonest, politically motivated anti-Trump zealots, entrenched DEI advocates clinging to their positions, extremist pro-Palestinian propagandists spreading Hamas’s lies, or the usual radical left-wing ideologues and socialists. Their cries of “academic freedom” and “free speech” are nothing more than shields to hide their hypocrisy, personal agendas, and outright lies. This motley crew of extremists would destroy the University if given even half a chance, and the fact that they can rally a significant bloc in the faculty Senate should alarm everyone.
Their dominance has silenced opposing voices among faculty. “No one argued against the mutual defense compact during the Senate meeting.” Really? That silence doesn’t reflect consensus; it reflects fear. These radicals have bullied dissenters into submission, and their unchecked influence is steering the University toward disaster.
Jeff
Apr 30, 2025 at 9:59 am
The University that literally collaborated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology on SARS-CoV-2. How interesting.
Methinks
Apr 28, 2025 at 2:16 pm
1) Yes, but how about our own President? There is a open letter now signed by over 520 university presidents (from, e.g., Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Columbia, NWU, Penn, Cornell, Rutgers, UCLA, UC Berkeley, Duke, U Michigan, UW-Madison, U Illinois-Urbana, UW-Seattle, etc, ) conveying a position of, and need for, solidarity. As of 4/28 morning, RC’s name is still absent (after 1 week).
2) There’s a phrase “show us the money”.
Methinks 1 and 2 say something. Details, details, details. I’m just so confused.
Susan Pastin
Apr 28, 2025 at 1:32 pm
Good for my Alma Mater! Give these fascists an inch and they will imprison all of us in a Dark Age for centuries!
Unity is strength. We must all resist the extreme right’s divide-and-conquer tactics! Resist, resist, resist. But listen to others also fighting for social justice.
Mark Hove
Apr 28, 2025 at 11:47 am
I’m so, so glad some people are showing courage to try and maintain important institutions during pressures from the federal executive office to conform to ever-changing, ever-shrinking restrictions.